Originally posted on A contrario on 16 June 2007
I have always had a very difficult time grasping the intellectual foundations of relativism in post-modernity. As I continue to examine the tenets of this popular philosophy, I view it with rapidly diminishing credulity. To minimise confusion as much as possible in this discussion (a rather difficult task when dealing with certain components of post-modern ideology), I should begin by clearly stating the elements of relativism that I am taking exception with. The particular claim of relativism I am referring to is that which contends that because the human intellect is incapable of acquiring complete and infallible knowledge of any given truth, no single interpretation of a truth can be considered superior to any other. This notion, perhaps more accurately referred to as epistemological relativism, is a prevalent idea in some schools of post-modern thought.
Bookmark/Search this post with: